UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Although many wild birds carry Salmonella, the strains of the bacteria they convey usually do not harbor antimicrobial-resistance genes, according to Penn State researchers, who led a team conducting a new, nationwide study.
That’s good news, according to team leader Ed Dudley, professor of food science, Penn State.
“While we’ve known for a while that wild birds can carry Salmonella, the strains they carry appear to be of lesser concern to human health,” he said. “The assumption was that these Salmonella — like the bacteria we can isolate from domesticated farm animals — would carry large numbers of antimicrobial-resistance genes. We found the opposite to be true.”
Wild birds are known to be common reservoirs of Salmonella enterica, a pathogen that sickens millions of people every year, Dudley explained, and scientists have worried that wild birds carrying antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica pose a risk to public health because they can spread the resistant bacteria across large areas in a short time. This research indicates that wild birds do not serve as important reservoirs of resistant Salmonella enterica strains.
To reach their conclusion, researchers whole-genome sequenced 375 Salmonella enterica strains from wild birds collected in 41 U.S. states from 1978–2019 to examine bacterial resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals. The study — which was spearheaded by Yezhi Fu, a postdoctoral researcher in Dudley’s research group in the College of Agricultural Sciences — answers important questions about the role migrating birds play in transmitting diseases to humans.