“Noise can be especially problematic for sleepers because parts of our brain stay vigilant to our environment during sleep, especially noises of something that could be a threat,” said co-author Orfeu Buxton, Dadzie’s doctoral adviser and professor of biobehavioral health at Penn State.
What was surprising, according to the researchers, was that the sleep environment did not affect how long people slept. Though further research is needed, the researchers said they suspected that young people could compensate for disruptions during the night because they may have more flexibility to sleep in.
The researchers said they intentionally focused on the perception of environmental factors rather than objective measures like decibels, lumens and degrees because the experience of what disrupts one’s sleep is personal and not based on an objective threshold. Other studies have shown that objective measures can also capture environmental disruptors of sleep.
“I grew up in New York City,” Dadzie said. "So, what might qualify as normal background noise to me might seem extremely loud to someone who grew up in a rural area.”
Buxton, who is also associate director of the Penn State Social Science Research Institute, said this research is important because young adulthood is a critical developmental period.
“Human development is typically based on things we learn when we are young,” said Buxton, who is also associate director of the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. “If you eat your vegetables as a child, you will probably eat them as an adult. Similarly, if you develop good sleep habits as a young adult, it is less likely that accumulated sleep loss will affect you later in life.”
The researchers emphasized that people who cannot control their environment can often take steps to address potential sleep disruptions. Buxton and Dadzie recommended ear plugs, noise-cancelling devices or cotton to block noise and sleep masks or blackout curtains to block light.
Other Penn State researchers who contributed to this study include Yuqi Shen, doctoral candidate in biobehavioral health; Lindsay Master, former researcher in biobehavioral health; Timothy Brick, associate professor of human development and family studies; and Anne-Marie Chang, associate professor of biobehavioral health.
David Reichenberger of the Department of Psychiatry at University of Arizona; Angel Collie of the Department of Clinical & Health Psychology at University of Florida; and Gina Marie Mathew and Lauren Hale of the Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine in the Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University also contributed to this research.
The research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01HD073352-10, as well as a consortium of private foundations. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.
At Penn State, researchers are solving real problems that impact the health, safety and quality of life of people across the commonwealth, the nation and around the world.
For decades, federal support for research has fueled innovation that makes our country safer, our industries more competitive and our economy stronger. Recent federal funding cuts threaten this progress.
Learn more about the implications of federal funding cuts to our future at Research or Regress.