“In this study, we saw a clear effect of genetic risk in how quickly women regained weight,” Lee said. “On the other hand, genetic risk did not influence weight loss. When the environment was changed enough — in this case through a low-fat diet and meetings with a dietician every two-to-three weeks — women seemed to overcome genetic risk, at least temporarily.”
With enough changes to the environment, healthy weight maintenance might be possible regardless of people’s genetic risk, Lee explained.
“We are starting to understand the deeply complex factors that influence weight loss amount and speed, as well as weight gain or regain amount and speed,” Lee said. “Genetics matter, but so do environmental changes.”
Race and understanding genetic risk
Though genetic risk influenced weight regain for white women, it did not predict how quickly Black women regained weight. Lee said that two factors likely explain why the polygenic risk score was useful only for white women.
First, the genetic datasets used to create polygenic risk scores commonly contain many more white participants than Black participants. As a result, the risk score used in this study accounts for 12% of obesity in white people but only 8% of obesity in Black people.
“Because fewer Black people were involved in the creation of the risk score, it does not represent them as accurately,” Lee explained, noting that many different factors in addition to genetics can contribute to weight outcomes.
Second, any effect of genetics was harder to observe in this dataset because it contained fewer Black women compared to white women, Lee said.
“The combination of smaller sample size and the lower accuracy of the risk score likely prevented us from detecting how genetic risk affected weight changes in Black women in post-menopause,” Lee said.
Genetics likely affect weight for Black individuals, too, according to Lee, but until minoritized populations are better represented in data, researchers will not be able to detect those effects.
“This is a significant problem,” Lee said. “Researchers want to use genetic data to understand health and make recommendations for all people. We do not want to exclude subsets of people based on race. We need to find ways to include more people of color in large scale genetic studies.”
Christy Avery, Misa Graff, Daeeun Kim and Kari North of the Department of Epidemiology at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Josh Arias of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics at the National Cancer Institute; Linda Van Horn of the Department of the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University; and Charles Kooperberg of The Division of Public Health Sciences at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center contributed to this research.
This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
At Penn State, researchers are solving real problems that impact the health, safety, and quality of life of people across the commonwealth, the nation and around the world.
For decades, federal support for research has fueled innovation that makes our country safer, our industries more competitive and our economy stronger. Recent federal funding cuts threaten this progress.
Learn more about the implications of federal funding cuts to our future at Research or Regress.