Research

Small but mighty: Helping microgreens pack even more of a nutritional punch

By adding iron, changing the colors of indoor lighting and altering water, researchers aim to improve production and nutrient content of tiny plants to help provide global nutrition security

Three members of the microgreens research team standing next to a vertical hydroponic tower for the cultivation of microgreens. From left: Sanchita Saha, who earned her master’s degree from the Department of Plant Science this past spring; Rishi Ravichandran, a doctoral candidate in the intercollege graduate degree program in plant biology; and Aline Novaski Seffrin, doctoral candidate in agricultural and environmental plant science. Credit: Penn State. Creative Commons

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Microgreens are nutritional powerhouses. A team of plant scientists at Penn State conducting research on multiple microgreens aspects recently published three studies reporting progress on multiple fronts, including iron enrichment, productive indoor growth and a faux lightning technique that could improve microgreens growth, yield and nutritional quality.

First, the researchers found that in soilless growing systems, adding modified iron fertilizer can make radish and pea microgreens significantly richer in iron without substantially compromising their growth or nutritional quality. That’s important, they said, because growing iron-enriched microgreens could be a practical way to improve dietary iron intake and help combat human iron deficiency. The researchers recently published their findings in Biological Trace Element Research.

In a second study, the team determined the effect of the red-to-blue LED light ratio on growth and quality of microgreens grown indoors at low light conditions. By adjusting the ratio of red and blue light under energy-efficient light intensity levels, the researchers concluded that indoor growers may be able to produce microgreens with more desirable nutritional properties. They recently published their findings in Horticulturae.

Finally, in a third study, the team found that plasma-activated water — made by exposing water and the air directly above it to high-voltage electrical discharges, mimicking natural lightning to dissolve oxygen and nitrogen into the liquid — could improve the growth, yield and nutritional quality of pea microgreens. They recently reported their findings in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.

“Each study is addressing a different issue, however, in all three we are using agronomic approaches — crop management practices — and technological solutions to enhance the quality and nutritional value of microgreens, while improving their resource use efficiency,” said team leader and senior author on all three studies, Francesco Di Gioia, associate professor of vegetable crop science in the College of Agricultural Sciences. “The work is important because the microgreen industry is continuing to grow, and with nutrient-dense microgreens, we can address malnutrition issues and improve our diet.”

A fertilizer called Fe-EDTA was the most effective at increasing iron levels in radish and pea microgreens (shown here), the team found.  Credit: Penn State. Creative Commons

Fertilizing microgreens with an iron fertilizer yields iron-rich plants

In this study, the researchers tested five iron fertilizers to determine which was most effective at increasing iron levels in radish and pea microgreens. The fertilizers were applied through irrigation at different concentrations. A fertilizer called Fe-EDTA was the most effective, the team found. It increased iron content by three to five times in radish microgreens and two to three times in pea microgreens compared with plants that received no iron fertilizer.

According to the researchers, Fe-EDTA fertilizer could be highly effective for iron biofortification in microgreens because it provides a stable, highly water-soluble and bioavailable form of iron under typical microgreens growing conditions.

“Fertilizing microgreens with iron is tricky because its chemical form affects how easily plants can absorb it,” said study first author Rishi Ravichandran, a doctoral candidate in the intercollege graduate degree program in plant biology. “Also, in excess amounts, iron can compete with the uptake of other essential minerals and can become toxic for plants, so our experiment was a bit of a delicate balance.”

The team was able to demonstrate that Fe-EDTA provided a more stable form of iron and increased iron content while causing minimal negative effects on plant yield and mineral composition.

“It’s really the first time the enrichment efficacy of different iron fertilizers has been tested in microgreens,” Ravichandran said.

In this study, the researchers tested five iron fertilizers to determine which was most effective at increasing iron levels in radish and pea microgreens. Pea plant early shoots are shown here. Credit: Penn State. Creative Commons

Iron deficiency in people — primarily affecting women and children — can lead to physical and cognitive problems, and growing iron-enriched microgreens could be a practical way to improve dietary iron intake and help combat iron deficiency at household and community scales, he added.

LED lighting color ratios affect growth, nutrients

In the second study, the team experimented with the red-to-blue LED light ratio at low light conditions typical of indoor microgreens growing operations to improve the growth, quality and nutritional content of radish and broccoli microgreens.

The researchers found that microgreens grown under 100% blue, red or white light grew taller, which is generally not desirable as shorter shoots are preferred. Blue light produced the tallest shoots and the lowest dry biomass — plant material after water is removed. Higher dry matter content is better for shelf life. However, the blue light produced the highest antioxidant activity in plants — which can help combat free radicals and promote human health — increasing antioxidants by about 16.3% across both microgreen species.

Different light combinations resulted in changes in the plants’ mineral contents. A mixture of 75% red and 25% blue light produced the highest nitrogen content, the team reported. In broccoli microgreens, mixtures exposed to red and blue light also increased iron concentrations by 15% to 20% compared with single-color or white light.

No single light treatment was best for every outcome, noted study first author Aline Novaski Seffrin, doctoral candidate in agricultural and environmental plant science. Blue light favored antioxidant activity, while mixed red and blue light reduced shoot height and improved certain mineral levels.

The team experimented with the red-to-blue LED light ratio at low light conditions typical of indoor microgreens growing operations to improve the growth, quality and nutritional content of radish and broccoli microgreens. Credit: Penn State. Creative Commons

“Blue light may help microgreens develop more antioxidants, while combining red and blue light may help them accumulate certain minerals,” she said. “The ideal light combination depends on whether the goal is to maximize growth, biomass or nutritional value. It may be possible for growers to customize light regimens to achieve certain plant qualities.”

While light quality is known to influence plant growth and phytochemical accumulation, before this research, little was known about how red-to-blue LED ratios affect microgreens under low-light conditions, Novaski Seffrin said.

“This study is among the first to systematically evaluate the effects of red-to-blue spectral combinations on both productivity and nutritional quality of brassica microgreens grown under low-light conditions,” she said. “By examining growth, mineral composition, pigments and antioxidant traits, this work provides new insights into how spectral management can be used to maintain crop performance and enhance nutritional value in light-limited environments, supporting more nutrient-dense and resource-efficient microgreen production.”

Different light combinations resulted in changes in the plants’ mineral contents. No single light treatment was best for every outcome. The ideal light combination depends on whether the goal is to maximize growth, biomass or nutritional value. It may be possible for growers to customize light regimens to achieve certain plant qualities. Credit: Penn State. Creative Commons

Stored, plasma-activated water best to grow microgreens

The third study focused on plasma agriculture, a new, clean technology that uses only air, electricity and water, pointed out first author Sanchita Saha, who earned her master’s degree from the Department of Plant Science this past spring and is now a doctoral student at the University of Florida. Initially, she said, the research team’s focus was the effect of plasma-activated water on microgreens’ growth and yield, but they quickly assessed that the method actually improved plant qualities.

“The study suggests that plasma-activated water could be a more sustainable way to grow microgreens by improving plant productivity, water-use efficiency and nutritional quality while potentially reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers,” Saha said. “With the right treatment and storage times, it could become a one-stop sustainable technology that benefits the environment, growers and consumers alike.”

The team specifically considered plasma-activated water as a possible substitute for synthetic nitrogen fertilizer applications.

“However, plasma-activated water is not merely substituting nitrogen fertilizer,” Di Gioia said. “It is a more complex input that also has the potential to enhance the nutritional profile of microgreens.”

In the study, the researchers found that fresh plasma-activated water — used immediately after plasma treatment — contained more reactive oxygen and nitrogen compounds and had a lower pH. Water undergoing moderate treatment times of 30 to 90 minutes increased pea microgreen yield by 5% to 13%, but water given the longest treatment time of 120 minutes reduced microgreen yield, possibly because it stressed the plants.

Plasma-activated water study first author Sanchita Saha gives a presentation on her research. Plasma-activated water is not merely substituting nitrogen fertilizer. It is a more complex input that also has the potential to enhance the nutritional profile of microgreens. Credit: Penn State. Creative Commons

Storing plasma-activated water for 72 hours changed the water's chemistry, the team reported. Short-lived reactive compounds decreased, while nitrate levels increased. Every stored-water treatment improved pea microgreen yield compared with tap water, and some outperformed conventional nitrogen fertilizer.

The best outcome was achieved with plasma-activated water treated for 60 minutes and stored for 72 hours. That combination increased microgreens biomass by 19.7% and water-use efficiency by 21.5%.

Stored plasma-activated water also increased the plants’ calcium and magnesium content and raised levels of beneficial plant compounds, the team reported, including carotenoids, phenolics and flavonoids — compounds associated with antioxidant activity.

The iron fertilization research was funded by Open Philanthropy through the Food Resilience in the Face of Catastrophic Global Events grant, and by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture Specialty Crop Block Grants award numbers C940001096 and C940001528, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Hatch Appropriations under project number PEN05002 and accession number 7007517.

The LED lighting research was funded by the USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture Specialty Crop Block Grants number C940001528, “Advancing the Sustainability of Indoor Urban Agricultural Systems” and number C940001096, “Employing Agronomic Biofortification Techniques for the Production of High-Value Functional Vegetable Crops” and the support of the USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations, under project number PEN05002 and accession number 7007517.

The plasma-activated water research was funded by the USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture Specialty Crop Block Grants number C940001529, “Developing Plasma Agriculture Solutions to Improve Vegetable Yield and Quality” and by the Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences through the Strategic Networks and Initiatives Program, “Developing the Penn State Interdisciplinary Initiative on Plasma Agriculture,” with the support of Plasma Licensing Authority Inc. that provided the authors with the plasma generator. The study was partially supported by the Penn State Plant Biology Program and by Open Philanthropy through the grant Food Resilience in the Face of Catastrophic Global Events.

This content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the funders.

Contact