About a dozen students meet twice a week at Penn State Abington to discuss some of the most controversial and polarizing topics of our times, from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to issues in the Middle East to the 2024 presidential election.
As members of Abington’s Brandeis Global Engagement and Leadership Fellowship Program, these students can count on lively discussion, thought-provoking debates and a few disagreements. But there’s one more outcome that might be the most surprising, according to one student.
“No matter how passionate our discussions became, there were no contentious feelings,” said Kate Amato, a fourth-year student who was a member of the inaugural class of Brandeis Fellows. “In fact, every week, we always left class together.
“I found it so helpful to have a place on campus, in an academic setting, where you could express your opinions and ideas without feeling judged,” she said. “That’s rare.”
The program, established through a gift from 1968 Penn State alumni Barry and Renee Brandeis, was created for this very reason. The initiative is dedicated to fostering civil discourse among undergraduates. The discussion-based curriculum is rooted in the First Amendment’s guiding principles with opportunities for students to explore law, policy, leadership and democratic values through hands-on learning, case studies and dialogue spanning diverse viewpoints.
“We serve a diverse student body with all kinds of perspectives,” said Salar Ghahramani, associate professor of business law and international law and policy and the academic director for the program.
“Our goal is to create an environment where students feel at home, in a setting where they know their thoughts will be valued in a judgment-free zone,” he added.
Despite Ghahramani’s professional expertise in First Amendment issues, the discussion is entirely student-led. He modeled the class after Benjamin Franklin’s "Junto," a meeting which encouraged discussion and questions of morals, politics and natural philosophy, and to exchange knowledge of business affairs.
“I believe in the power of conversation and the value of listening and critical-thinking skills,” Ghahramani said. “With students from all backgrounds and majors, they can see how someone with a data science background might interpret a particular issue versus someone with a history background, for example.”
“And it’s okay to disagree — as long as we do it civilly,” he said.