ABINGTON, Pa. — A research seminar at Penn State Abington took an unexpected turn last fall when Pierce Salguero, professor of history and of health humanities, tasked his students with redesigning the entire course with artificial intelligence (AI) at the center of their workflow. It became a hands‑on opportunity to rethink their future workspaces where AI will likely be universal.
Salguero has taught this upper‑level capstone seminar for 15 years, guiding students through the research process from developing an idea to the final paper. But the rise of AI sparked a new question: What happens when students work with AI on every stage of the research process?
“We wanted to learn with AI, not let it think for us,” Salguero said. “It’s less like a calculator and more like a research collaborator or an intern, and you’re the senior partner. A recurring theme is to not let AI control the content.”
‘Grading AI’
Together, he and 10 students rebuilt the course so AI became integrated into developing the materials the needed for their specific research. Instead of Salguero evaluating students’ work, the class assessed how well AI performed college-level research tasks.
“Instead of me grading the students’ papers, we collectively graded AI,” Salguero explained. “We have collectively developed best practices for using AI, ideas about which platforms work best for which tasks, and a clear sense of the advantages and limitations of these tools.”
Students found that success depended on their ability to engineer prompts clearly, evaluate output critically, and stay firmly in the role of lead researcher or as one student said, “We want our soul in our work.”